patching...
Update: Get all the latest Stoughton Patch headlines delivered right to your inbox. Click here to signup for our FREE email newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATE: Stoughton Teachers Union Refutes Claim that Censured School Committee Member Disclosed Bargaining Strategy; School Committee Chair Responds

School Committee Member Dr. Erdem Ural was censured by his fellow members on the Stoughton School Committee March 14.

 

The following article was originally published March 19 and was updated March 22: 

The Stoughton School Committee voted 3-1 last Thursday to censure one of its members, Dr. Erdem Ural, for exceeding authority and insulting staff and opening the School Committee to legal liability; creating dysfunction within the School Committee and wasting taxpayer money; and submitting a rogue evaluation of the Superintendent.

Included in a lengthy list of concerns and issues spelled out in a case for censure, read during the meeting by School Committee Chair Deborah Sovinee, was the fact that Dr. Ural was "removed...from a union bargaining team because he spoke publicly and gave away the School Committee strategy." 

This was during the negotiations process for Educator Evaluations. 

The Stoughton Teachers Association refutes this, however.

As stated in the case for censure: 

He [Dr. Ural] had been given an opportunity to work on the Educator Evaluation negotiations. During that period, last fall, after we had a conversation in Dr. Rizzi’s office he went back into the meeting with the union negotiation team and told them our strategy. He then not only denied it but blamed the Chair saying that she was the one who gave away the strategy despite multiple witnesses to the reality of what actually took place.

During negotiation strategizing in Dr. Rizzi’s office he picked up a paper off a table and proceeded to read it. When told to put down the draft of a letter he refused and the Chair took it away. He later criticized the Superintendent to the union president and publicly revealed the draft’s contents compromising strategy related to bargaining. As School Committee members we are privy to confidential information and allowed into the Superintendent’s office where privacy must be maintained. Dr. Ural has violated this on numerous occasions.

Stoughton Teachers Association President Andrea Pires, a teacher at the South Elementary School, sent the following statement to Stoughton Patch: 

I am an elementary teacher and serve as President of the Stoughton Teachers Association.  I was a member of the team that recently negotiated the new evaluation system with the school committee.  At no time did any school committee member disclose internal bargaining strategy to me or any member of the STA team.

Sovinee responded to the STA statement, further detailing the negotiations:

Last October the School Committee was in the midst of negotiating for the new state-mandated Educator Evaluation tool. We understood that it changed the conditions of the Stoughton Teacher’s Association (STA) contract. In the process of revising work conditions there are collective bargaining meetings which include the normal give and take, offers and counter offers that are part and parcel of negotiations. The School Committee bargains for the town and our ability to do so effectively relies on a coordinated, agreed-upon approach.

During collective bargaining each side will leave the room to discuss strategy and agree upon negotiation goals and fallback positions. During the October bargaining session when we came back into the room Dr. Erdem Ural immediately revealed to the STA the School Committee’s fallback position thereby damaging what we were trying to accomplish. 

Dr. Ural agrees that strategy was divulged –- he says just that in a published letter, dated November 12, 2012, to me. STA President Andrea Pires, who says no strategy was revealed, might not have recognized Dr. Ural’s statement as a revelation. Other members of the STA and the Massachusetts Teacher’s Association rep were in the room, several of whom have a significant amount of bargaining experience, and may have recognized it as such.

Dr. Ural was first elected to the School Committee in 2008, and served a single term, defeated in a bid for reelection in 2011. However, he ran again in 2012 and won back a seat on the Committee, defeating longtime member Allan Mills. Ural is near the end of the first year in this current three-year term.

The censure does not remove Dr. Ural from office, but rather is a way for the other members of the Committee to denounce his actions, they said, and distance themselves from his statements.

Click here to read more about the censure

Related Topics: Censure, Dr. Erdem Ural, Stoughton Public Schools, Stoughton School Committee, Stoughton School Committee Censure, Stoughton Teachers Association, Stoughton Teachers Union, and stoughton

lowertaxes

1:13 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Thank you to the Teacher's Union for coming out and telling what you observed. I would like to know who the "Multiple Witnesses" are that are claiming Dr. Ural did what he was accused of. Is that something that the public can be told?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DB

9:03 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

How would the teachers union know what was discussed in the SC strategy sessions so that they could determine or way or another whether Dr. Ural gave away the SC strategy? Dr. Ural didn't actually deny this during the censure meeting (I actually watched it twice). It came up at an earlier SC meeting that Dr. Ural was corresponding directly with the Union President. This appears to be a politically motivated statement on behalf of the Union. The last thing I want to see is the Union interfering in Town politics. In fact it's illegal for public employees to try to influence local politics. The Union President is a public employee. Maybe Dr. Ural should refer the Union President to the Attorney Generals Office.

Robin

6:57 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

@lowertaxes I was just about to ask the same thing. Maybe "multiple witnesses" are the other SC members who are wrapped around Rizzi's finger? If the SC is lying about this, what else are they lying about, or hiding? Thank you to the STA for speaking up!

Reply
Comment_arrow

DB

9:05 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

Considering the fact that Dr. Ural refers everything he can to the Attorney Generals Office - why didn't he file a complaint regarding this. Maybe it's true....

Jane Doe

8:19 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

In bargaining over the way teachers will be evaluated, what bargaining strategies need to be kept private? What do they want to trick teachers into accepting? In fact, why is it necessary for the school committee to have secret bargaining strategies for any negotiation? Are they not supposed to bargain with the STA in "good faith"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DJ

10:44 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Jane, if there were no bargaining strategies then many would be clamoring that the SC gave away the bank. Of course you want to strategize as you want the best bang for your buck, do you not? The STU strategizes too or at least they should, though I don't think their past PR moves have been strategic or in any way conducive or beneficial to their cause. Strategizing is not a dirty word; is common practice and part of the job and has nothing to do with "good faith".

An oldtimer

9:36 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

It looks like the SC is more interested in teaching the children to be folowers, than to be independent thinkers. Children sit back, don't make waves, don't speak out for what you believe or you will be censured. The message is "to get along, go along" which is wrong, wrong, wrong. Speak your mind, be heard, read the Constitution, see what your rights are. Some where in there there is something called ,Freedom of Speech, the school committee does not like that. So sit back and don't question anything, don't complain about losing your rights. The schools tell your kids what they can eat, now what they can say. What's next what church they can go to?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DJ

10:35 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Sorry Oldtimer, but your way off base here. This country is often referred to as a nation of laws for good reason. By all means, read and study the Constitution and you will see for yourself it is built upon, challenged and expanded. No one is suggesting what you claim to be the case. Dr. Ural should by all means speak his peace and follow the rules just like everyone else has to do, children included.

Comment_arrow

DB

8:54 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

Hey Old Time. Let me help you understand the difference between "censure" and "censor", as they are not the same thing. All the School Committee did was express their disapproval for Dr. Ural's behavior (which is censure) - they never denied him the ability to express his views (which would be censor). If you want to meaningfully participate in the conversation, you need to actually know what you're talking about. I'm absolutely positive that if the School Committee violated Dr. Ural's Freedom of Speech, Dr. Ural would have reported them to the Ethic Commission (another legal bill...), which he hasn't done. What drives me crazy is the manner in which people continually misrepresent the facts to make Dr. Ural look like he is being persecuted.... It makes me feel as if the people who continue to distort the facts think the rest of us are stupid.

An oldtimer

4:49 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

To, DJ and DB, I'm sorry that I offend you two, I'm 85 and rember when we could talk and disagree. I guess that's not PC now. If you check you will see that I said "censure" never used the word "censor". Interested to know what has been misrepresented.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DJ

10:53 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

What a stretch Oldtimer. Who said you offended us? I didn't write that nor did I imply it. I disagreed with your prior post and stated why, just as you claim we should be able to do, yet you falsely politicize this and call it a void of political correctness.

DB clearly addressed how you misused the wort "censure" as many others have done, but you sir, repeatedly even after it has been brought to your attention. You may have spelt the word "censure" correctly, but your post clearly used the definition of "censor" arguing Urals, freedom of speech and first amendment rights were violated and stymied, which is not the case. He was reprimanded for violating the rules of conduct and for acting outside of his authority.

Comment_arrow

Robin

10:08 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

DJ, looks like you clearly misused the word "wort" in your response. A wort is a plant - perhaps you meant word? Maybe you should look at your own comments instead of disrespecting others and their opinions, which we are entitled to just as much as you are.

Snyder's Stoughton

5:54 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

I never had the teacher's union rep Andrea Pires return my numerous calls. Doesn't say much for them, does it? I pride myself in presenting both sides of every issue in this town. Sue Cogliano made the same mistake initially. Picking and choosing media outlets--without sending releases to ALL--is an issue in itself. I have taken no sides in the censure issue, but I have written that I think it could backfire on the SC. My full opinions, with comments from the players, is on www.snydersstoughton.com/news.htm. I'm enjoying reading this great conversation under Jeff's great article.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DJ

11:31 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

Thank you for this update. Very disappointed in the Stoughton Teachers Union the past few years and have been hoping they would secure more prudent and non contentious leadership, but this most recent action by Andra Piras is discouraging. I think DB's first post eloquently outlined how inappropriate it was.

Comment_arrow

Ms Acuminous

3:11 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

Speaking of presenting all sides of the issue, why is it that no articles have been written about the recent debates that the School Committee candidates have engaged in? (Unless I missed it.)... I know a few Stoughton residents that do not watch the local television broadcast, work night hours, work double shifts, or do not attend the town meetings- but they do read. Maybe I am mistaken in thinking that the Patch plays a role in informing Stoughton residents (but then there'll be an article that comes out berating town members as apathetic- ok, that might be stretching it, it's a bone i'll pick later)

John Smith

7:04 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

As an educator, I find it very sad that the SC does not seem to put the schools and education at the forefront of their decsion making. Although the union and our contract are in place to protect educators, teachers spend their own money and work after hours with no pay because we do whats in the best interest of our students. If not for the union, our schools would be in far worse condition. The students are sufferring on a daily basis due to budget cuts and the SC determining which positions are disposable, all while sitting behind a desk.
Try being evaluated on professional development when there are no "funds" to attend conferences and the "workshops" offerred by the schools are in disciplines not related to your area. Try working effectively when pieces of ceiling are falling on your head and there is no paper to make copies. How about being evaluated on student performance when the students don't attend school, refuse to complete the work, or have no support at home. Is that fair? How about we evaluate the school committee on fulfillment of educator/school needs which directly impacts our effectiveness as teachers. Maybe if educators were paid more, many wouldn't have to work other jobs, which would allow more time to focus on teaching.
Town "politics", or personal agendas, are directly and negatively impacting our schools and teachers and we wonder why our youth demonstrate less respect for adults and education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DJ

11:23 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

John, are you so barking at the wrong tree. If you understood the process better you'd know that year after year the Superintendent and SC beg, borrow and steal to get every penny they can for their budget, which is approved by Town Meeting members, not the SC. The SC/administration hands are tied and they are at the mercy of the State, Federal and local government. Have you not been privy to the great debates over the percentage of funds the schools should receive relative to the Town side? The schools are also up against dictates and mandates that must be fulfilled and funded. Your reference to professional development being one of them. As for working after school hours, this is also written into your contract, but I'm sure like many in the private sector, you work beyond that too. Keep in mind that the Superindent works ungodly hours attending evening meetings and fighting for your budget, but she's paid well. The School committee attends many of these meetings too and they are paid NOTHING! And I can attest they are fighting for every dollar they can get and working their tales off to get you into newer or better accommodations.

An oldtimer

6:18 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

According to DJ, I'm just a stupid old man, so will some one explaint what "a rogue evaluation of the Superentendent" means to the school committee? I know what "rogue" and 'evaluation" mean. Have trouble putting them together.

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

8:57 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

DJ: If I recall ... one recent Town manager resigned because Supt. Rizzi bullied her way out of complying with town supervision of her budget with legal threats and wrangling. Be on the receiving end of Stoughton School District retaliatory actions and you won't take for granted that Rizzi and the SC are concerned with submitting to the oversight of town government, or anyone else for that matter.

Reply

Robin

10:09 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Interesting fact that just came out in the Sunday Enterprise today - Dr. Rizzi is the highest paid town employee, making $154,250.02 in 2012! Unbelievable!

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

10:53 am on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Dear Robin: If I recall the history I've read correctly, one reason for the high salary is that we've allowed the SC engage in the closed door evaluations and dealings with Rizzi regarding compensation and contract. But let's digress from the not-so-relevant point DJ and OldTimer have focused on. ** We get what we pay for. ** metaphorically speaking. We can whine and complain on the patch board all we want. But, until we V-O-T-E our frustration, legally and peacefully protest by writing the SC and attending meetins, EN MASSE, nothing will be done. The written objections on Patch forum don't mean diddly-squat to the SC or Rizzi, because they carry no consequences, and they allow those people to continue without accountability. Of those writing, who is showing up at meetings (been there), voiced concerns to the SC and candidates (done that), and I have something important to lose if Rizzi, district personnel or the SC decide to retaliate for my involvement. And that, my friends, is not outside the realm of very real possibility, as I have painfully found out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robin

12:31 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Dear Jane doe two...I am not whining on the patch wall and I find that an extremely disrespectful comment. I have done ALL of the above - meetings, letters to the SC AND RIZZI, voting in EVERY election and have experienced the retaliatory wrath of Rizzi and her staff and school district personnel. And I have also encouraged others to do the same. Not that I have to defend myself to you...but don't assume until you know. Thank you!

DJ

3:54 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

What is your problem with Rizzi's pay? Crimmins was paid more even back in 2010, and even though the schools employ more then double the personnel then the municipal side and have more buildings and footage to maintain, not to mention her salary is in keeping with area peer pay. The SP Chief is just $1K behind with a fraction of the operating budget or personnel.

Too your prior post JDTwo, You can turn a blind eye as to the reason's that support Rizzi's pay; consistency with job rating/pay for area, the majority wanting to retain her, consistency with similar bargaining contracts, but you can't pretend those facts do not exist. I'm not here to defend Rizzi and I won't defend some of her actions, but just as I noted prior, Rizzi does not dictate budget, it is voted on by 160 plus town meeting member.

Robin, stop personalizing everything. JD2 meant we all need to vote, not you in particular.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robin

5:41 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

I believe if you polled parents and teachers, the majority DO NOT want to keep her. She has not proven to be worth that much by a long shot. I'm sorry that you find it necessary to argue with every comment made by others, but I not here to debate.

Comment_arrow

DJ

6:53 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Have you counted your posts lately? Talk about one way street.
JD2, an "anonymous Change.org petition"? If the rolls were reversed, would you give any credit to a movement that remained anonymous? There is no credibility in anonymity, which is not unlike these blogs. Those that sign their names are sticking their necks out and standing up in what they believe. They are the only posts with real value. I don't buy fear of retaliation. It's just fear.

Jane DoeTwo

5:55 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Dear Robin,
I was sorry to see your comments, because of all the posters, I admire your comments the most. What irked me was what I saw as a digression into personal back-and-forth that didn't contribute. I realize there are some that have engaged in the process. However, at the last SC meeting I attended I was the only parent. Due to an prior appointment, I could not attend the censure meeting, but I heard there were 15 members of the community. We need -- quite frankly -- higher numbers.
The room needs to be SRO. I'm trying to start an anonymous Change.org petition (if anyone wants to beat me to it, be my guest) for the SC to rescind the censure. My only point was to put a little heat under all of us (myself included) to act, and wasn't directed at you personally.
To respond to DJ: Respectfully, I submit that your arguments support the high pay for the **position**. My opinion is that Rizzi does not earn that salary based on her performance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robin

7:44 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Dear Jane doe two - Please accept my apology for taking your comment personally, but I am one who has done all of the things you suggest. I absolutely agree that Rizzi does not earn that salary based on her performance. I would love for anyone to tell us what remarkable things she has done since taking this job. I mean really, maybe there is something I'm not aware of, because the only thing I've seen with her is controvery from day one - from the closed door contract extension, to problems with following the rules with the town manager, to ruling by intimidation...if she had any dignity, with all of the negativity surrounding her, she would resign. DJ has obviously never opposed Rizzi, her staff or the SC, because if so, DJ would know that retaliation from then IS real and is not fear. Many parents I know, including myself, who have spoken up have had our opposition not only taken out on us, but on our children. DJ you also talk about the lack of credibility in being anonymous and those who use their names are the only posts with real value...why not use your real name then?

Comment_arrow

Heather

9:22 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

I too agree that Dr. Rizzi has not proven her worth and does not deserve the salary she is making. I did attend the censure meeting. I am ashamed to say it was the first I did attend but am happy to say it will not be my last. I hope that more parents will attend. I also hope that more parents will learn the issues and head out to the polls next month. I have found Dr. Rizzi to be rude and dismissive any time that I have had dealings with her. I feel that she brushes aside the messy situations that she doesn't want to deal with. I agree with Robin when she states that a poll of parents and teachers would show that the town does not want her here. I have talked with many parents and teachers who who feel this way. In fact I can not think of a single parent or teacher that I have talked to that approves of her. Maybe it is time for the SC to start listening to us. If they won't in the meeting maybe they will when we go to the polls and vote them out.

Jane DoeTwo

5:57 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

I'd also like to respectfully suggest that we use this forum to explore ideas for legal, peaceful action leveraging our democratic process so we can achieve what I believe is our common goal: School district leadership that values the welfare of our children: their safety, their education and their development above all else.

Reply

Ms Acuminous

8:27 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

April 30th is around the corner. We have an opportunity to vote in 2 SC members, but it's up to us to decide who they will be. I think the idea of a change.org petition is good, but Stoughton is not that big: b/w sports, clubs, and local "hangouts" we should be able to gather the support from parents needed to show we care, expect to be heard, and aren’t looking for leaders with an agenda that puts our children last (or even 2nd to their own). I don’t believe parents and town members are apathetic. Many parents don't know “HOW” to be involved or more importantly “WHY” to be involved. If the handful of folks on here really want a better Stoughton, a SPS system that is competitive, so much so that folks in neighboring towns are looking at Stoughton property, than the answer to “WHY be involved” needs to be explicitly laid out so that actionable “HOW” steps can be carried out. As an SPS parent, I would love to see a SPS system that is a Level 1 top performing, w/high graduation rate, low achievement gap, producing high achieving and college/career ready students. Unfortunately in my case, SPS system has about 2 years to move aggressively in that direction (yes, I am willing to be a part of that movement), or I will have to dig deeper into my pockets and seek alternative schooling. Lastly, to those complaining about town or school meeting attendance- When was the last time you invited 3 neighbors or town friends to attend the meeting?

Reply

DJ

9:41 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

I'd very much like to understand why so many parents and teachers would ever have personal experience and contact with the Superintendent of Schools (SoS)? I mean there is such thing as proper protocol. You've got the teacher, department head, guidance, special needs coordinator, assistant principal, principal, The School Committee, assistant superintendent all before you get the the SoS.

Perhaps the SoS has an open door policy? Even then, do that many people ignore protocol? How would you feel if that happened to you where you work? Perhaps the SoS office should be located in a separate building like it is in most communities. All I know is that with four kids through the system, I've never approached the SoS directly. Problems or concerns were addressed by the lower chain of command and almost always that was the teacher. My knowledge of the SoS comes from municipal meetings, aired meetings and social functions. I too have spoken to numerous parents and teachers and their experience is not unlike mine. They have nothing negative to say less the rumors they've heard or read, teachers included.

The SC should be the voice of the people so it is crucial to have an open mic opportunity at meetings and I'm glad that has been instituted.

Heather, you've written excessively of your dislike of Rizzi and the SC claiming personal experience, but above you note the censure was the first meeting you attended. What is wrong with that picture?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ladyknight

1:01 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

DJ,

I would hope that lots of parents and community members would have some contact with the Superintendent, even to say hi and chat briefly. This does not mean that she would be involved in every problem- but she should be meeting with parents when there isn't a problem.

As for the chain of command-- if there are complaints about a particular school administrative issue, the school committee would be the last on the chain of command, not the superintendent, since the superintendent is the CEO of the schools and the SC's role is to oversee the superintendent. If a parent has an issue with the teacher, the appropriate way would be to raise the issue with the teacher first, and then that teacher's principal, and then depending on the issue- either the Asst. Superintendent (if it is a curriculum/instruction issue) or the Superintendent (principals report to the superintendent.) Only after giving the Superintendent a chance to resolve the issue, would it be appropriate to contact the SC. Of course, anyone can contact SC members anytime about questions, but if there is an issue with a particular person, they shouldn't start w/ the committee.

I am also glad that the SC instituted an open comment portion to the meeting. I also like to see people attending SC meetings, though many people find it difficult and watch it at home. However, I don't think attending SC meetings is the only way that one should take to form an opinion of the superintendent.

Jane DoeTwo

11:43 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

Ms Acuminus,
Give me to the end of the week to see if I can do a change.org petition (anonymously), and I will work with you on your ideas of working with people face-to-face to organize some advocacy for your children.

I'm not trying to sound defensive, but acknowledge that your idea of inviting neighbors is a good one. I did invite one neighbor to a meeting more than once, but she has found reasons not to attend each time. I aimed, but missed the mark. I don't know many parents, but I'm working on it. I haven't quit trying that yet.

Reply

Robin

8:03 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Dear Jane doe two - I would also be willing to help in any way with this. I would like to go a step farther and fight to have Rizzi removed, but as Ms A pointed out, some parents, including me, don't know how to go about organizing a movement. I thought letters to the SC etc would bring about the conversation, but not with the current SC. I would like us to get beyond the scandals brought on by Rizzi and have a superintendent who genuinely cares about our children and schools.

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

9:11 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Robin and Heather,
I just wrote up a list of ideas that was 5 characters short of the limit, only to have it obliterated by the login page. I'm going to boil it down to one important item this time.

To communicate with each other:
Do we want to meet, or remain online for a while?
I've run a wordpress blog before, and for our purposes, a wordpress page would be free. Should I look into that as a means for us to communicate with each other and form strategies and plans, and also to present ourselves to the public? I also know people who are very adept at web design, etc., so I can look into us trying to have a forum like this to keep in touch and up to date. Your thoughts, please.

Also, I don't want to clog The Patch forum with the other suggestions I had for a plan, so let's work on a way to discuss them either online or in person first.

Reply

Robin

11:30 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

I agree we should take the discussion elsewhere. I would have no problem giving you my email address, I'm just contimplating if its wise to give it on here. It sounds like you are experienced with this sort of thing, so I am open to what you suggest.

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

12:04 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Hey Robin, let's absolutely protect our privacy here - so I agree posting an email here is a not good idea. I'm pretty sure I'm going to set up an anonymous email for interested people. Today is a very hectic day, so I'll get more done on a website/blog page tomorrow. I can also get with a geek I know and see what some other options are. If you know other interested parents, by all means invite them to participate with us.

Reply

Robin

12:32 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

What about a Facebook page just to get us started and help us connect? This all sounds great! I look forward to hearing more when you get more info!

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

12:46 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Robin, I thought about that, and I'm not all that great at Facebook pages because I don't use them socially. That said, I think it's a great idea. I think we could/should use that to communicate. Should we then also do a wordpress page to put ourselves and the information (past documentation of issues with the SC and/or Rizzi) out there? A two-pronged approach? And also, not to sound silly, but do we call ourselves anything yet? A group name?

Reply

Jane DoeTwo

12:46 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Heather, what are your thoughts?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heather

4:08 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

I think the FB page to start would be a good idea. Then we can see who is in and make contact from there.

Robin

3:11 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

I can set up a Facebook page - we just have to think of a group name. I don't know much about Wordpress.

Reply

Ms Acuminous

4:07 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Great ideas Jane, Robin and Heather. I like the idea of a Facebook page also. I would like to keep our purpose focused on the positives so that there isn't a fear of joining the page. I'll think of ideas for a page name and check back in later. Also the Fb page is easy to share information and spread the word in Stoughton.

Reply

Robin

9:13 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

Heather, Jane doe 2, and Miss A - are you all still interesting in connecting thru a Facebook page?

Reply

Robin

9:06 am on Saturday, March 30, 2013

I created a Facebook page called Concerned Parents for Stoughton Schools, if anyone wants to connect there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heather

10:08 am on Saturday, March 30, 2013

Thanks Robin. I am going to attach a link to your page for people. http://www.facebook.com/ConcernedParentsForStoughtonSchools

Jane DoeTwo

10:04 pm on Wednesday, April 3, 2013

I have posted to facebook. I apologize that it's taken me some time to follow up.

Reply

Leave a comment